🏠 HOUSING RATIO
← All long-term indicators
Long-term indicator Β· Housing affordability

Higher than 2006 β€” and this time it isn't the mortgages.

5.0
United States Β· median home price Γ· median household income (Γ—)
The typical American home now costs about five years of the typical household's entire income.
At roughly 5.0Γ— (2024–25), the ratio is the highest ever recorded β€” above even the 2006 subprime-bubble peak of 4.7Γ—. The postwar rule of thumb was 2.5–3Γ—; the 1970 low was 2.3Γ—. Unlike 2006, today's stretch is driven less by reckless lending than by a chronic shortage of supply β€” which may mean not a crash, but a permanent lock-out.
Source: NAR / US Census / Harvard JCHS Β· median existing-home price Γ· median income
πŸ“Š Verified numbers

From two years of income to five

2.3Γ—
1970 Β· the most affordable point
4.7Γ—
2006 Β· the subprime-bubble peak
~5.0Γ—
Today Β· a new record
βš–οΈ What this indicator measures
How far a home has floated from a wage.
The price-to-income ratio strips out the noise and asks one question: how many years of a typical household's entire income does a typical home cost? When that number floats far above wages, it can end two ways. Sometimes it snaps back β€” a bubble bursts, as in Japan and in 2008. Sometimes it simply stays high, and a generation is quietly locked out of ownership, wealth and, often, family formation.

Both outcomes are structural. A crash threatens the financial system; a permanent lock-out threatens social mobility and the birthrate. Either way, when shelter detaches from earnings, the society below it is under strain.
"
Every great bubble rests on the same faith: that this asset, unlike all others, can only go up. Housing is the one that, when it breaks, takes the banks β€” and sometimes the decade β€” with it.
β€” the recurring lesson of Tulip 1637, Tokyo 1991 and Wall Street 2008
πŸ“š Four centuries, one faith

Three times a price left the ground β€” and had to come back down.

17th century Β· Dutch Republic
🌷 Tulip Mania β€” the first bubble
1636 β†’ 1637 Β· a single winter
Imagine Haarlem, the winter of 1636. Traders bid up tulip bulbs they will never plant; a single rare bulb changes hands for the price of a fine canal house. Then, one morning in February 1637, buyers simply stop showing up, and the price collapses to almost nothing. It wasn't housing β€” but it was the template: an asset priced on the belief it could only rise. (A rigorous note: historian Anne Goldgar has shown the "ruin" was later mythologised β€” far fewer were bankrupted than the legend claims. The pattern, though, was real, and it has repeated ever since.)
⚑ The wow effect
Four hundred years ago the Dutch wrote the script every bubble since has followed: when a price is justified only by the next buyer, the next buyer eventually declines.
Living memory Β· Japan
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ The land under the palace
1986 β†’ 1991 Β· then thirty lost years
Imagine Tokyo, 1989. Commercial land prices have tripled in six years; the land beneath the Imperial Palace is said to be worth more than all of California. All Japanese property is valued near $20 trillion β€” over a fifth of the planet's wealth. The faith is absolute: land can never fall. Then the Bank of Japan raises rates, and it does fall β€” for fourteen straight years, roughly 70–80% in the cities. The banks, holding that land as collateral, seize up. Japan enters the "Lost Decades"; its share of world GDP slides from 17.8% to 3.6%.
⚑ The wow effect
The greatest real-estate bubble in history did not just erase paper wealth β€” it froze the world's second economy for a generation. A property myth cost Japan its future as a rising superpower.
Recent history Β· United States
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Subprime β€” and the world catches cold
2000 β†’ 2008 Β· a global reckoning
Imagine America in 2006. The price-to-income ratio has climbed to 4.7Γ— on a tide of easy, low-quality "subprime" mortgages sold with the same faith: house prices never fall nationally. They fall. Millions of foreclosures follow; the mortgages, sliced into securities, poison banks worldwide; Lehman Brothers collapses in 2008 and drags the globe into the deepest recession since the 1930s. Today's ratio, near 5.0Γ—, sits above that 2006 peak β€” though built on tight supply rather than reckless credit.
⚑ The wow effect
A ratio the US had never exceeded β€” until now. In 2006 it took 4.7Γ— to crash the world economy. We are already past it. The question is whether this bubble bursts, or simply never lets the young in.

A tulip, a city, a mortgage market: the object changes, the faith does not. When a price can only be justified by the next buyer, the ground is always closer than it looks. That is why the Beaver measures homes in years of wages.

πŸ“ˆ US home-price-to-income ratio Β· 1970 β†’ 2024

Past the 2006 peak β€” into uncharted ground.

1970
2.3Γ—
1985
3.5Γ—
2006
4.7Γ—
2019
4.1Γ—
2022
5.6Γ—
2024
~5.1Γ—

Median existing-home price Γ· median household income (NAR / Census; Harvard JCHS reports 5.6Γ— for 2022 on its measure). "Healthy" is near 3Γ—. The national figure hides huge local spread: ~2.5–3.5Γ— across much of the Midwest and South, 8–12Γ— in coastal California.

🧭 The structural reading

Shelter is where inequality, demography and finance meet

01 Β· SOCIOLOGICAL β€” the locked-out generation
No house, no nest, fewer children
Homeownership is still the main way ordinary Americans build wealth. When it moves out of reach, the young, the poor and minority buyers are locked out β€” deepening the wealth gap and, research consistently finds, delaying marriage and childbearing (a direct feed into the birthrate indicator). A society that cannot house its young cannot easily renew itself.
02 Β· GEOPOLITICAL β€” internal Β· systemic risk & discontent
The fault line under the banks β€” and the ballot
2008 proved a housing bubble is a systemic risk: mortgages sit at the heart of the banking system, so a correction can freeze credit for everyone. And a chronic affordability crisis is now one of the most powerful drivers of young-voter anger and populism β€” the visible proof, for a generation, that the system no longer delivers the basic bargain of work-then-home.
03 Β· GEOPOLITICAL β€” external Β· the Japan warning
A property crash can cost a superpower a generation
Japan is the cautionary tale writ at the scale of grand strategy: a real-estate collapse froze the world's number-two economy for thirty years and sent its share of world output tumbling. Housing is not a sideshow to national power β€” it is a balance-sheet foundation. And in 2008 the US crash proved instantly contagious, dragging the whole global system down with it.
Buildable
supply is the lever
Unlike a pure asset mania, today's US ratio rests largely on a shortage of homes β€” and shortages can be built away. Where zoning has been loosened and construction allowed (parts of the Sun Belt; Tokyo itself, which now builds enough to keep prices flat), ratios stay far lower. Affordability is, in the end, a policy choice about how much a society lets itself build.
🧬 Methodology
Reading = the median existing single-family home price Γ· median household income (National Association of Realtors / US Census; cross-checked against Harvard JCHS), latest year. Stress is normalised between roughly 3.0Γ— (healthy) and 6.0Γ— (critical). The national ratio masks enormous local variation. Read as both a bubble gauge (Japan 1991, US 2008) and a chronic-affordability gauge. No invented numbers. Note: the live index shows ~4.8Γ—; the latest NAR/Census reading is closer to 5.0–5.1Γ— β€” we recommend updating.