🦫 Beaver.Watch
← US editionStructural risk
Instrument Β· United States

An allocation can be diversified across assets and concentrated in a single assumption.

This index measures the structural political stress of the United States β€” popular immiseration, elite overproduction and state fiscal distress, read together. It does not forecast returns. Its relevance to a long-horizon allocation rests on published work linking socio-political instability to lower investment, cited in full below.

The conjunction
β€”
Immiseration
β€”
Inequality, housing, household debt, deaths of despair
Elite overproduction
β€”
Credentialed aspirants relative to positions
Fiscal distress
β€”
Federal debt as a share of GDP
Composite index
β€”
loading
β€”

The composite is a weighted geometric mean, not an arithmetic one. The structural-demographic claim is conjunctive: instability requires all three drivers to be elevated at once. An arithmetic mean would let one low component be averaged away β€” the geometric mean will not.

What sits underneath

Every input is a published series. Each is normalised between a healthy and a critical threshold β€” the same thresholds used by the long-term dashboard, so the index cannot contradict the public pages.

Loading components…

Test your assumption

Set a ten-year direction for each driver and read the resulting configuration. This is a scenario, not a forecast: it shows where an allocation's implicit assumption about American political stability would leave it, given a stated trajectory.

Popular immiseration

Inequality, housing cost, household debt, deaths of despair.

Elite overproduction

Credentialed aspirants relative to available elite positions.

State fiscal distress

Federal debt trajectory and the room it leaves for policy.

β€”
 
Set a trajectory above.

Scope

An instrument is only useful to a risk committee if its limits are stated before its outputs.

What it measures

  • Structural political stress, on a 0–100 scale
  • Which of the three drivers carries that stress
  • How far each input sits from its critical threshold
  • How the configuration moves under a stated trajectory

What it does not measure

  • Expected returns, on any asset or any horizon
  • The timing of any political event
  • Market pricing β€” the index is independent of it
  • Anything outside the United States

Why this belongs in an allocation discussion

The link between structural stress and capital is not our claim. It is a documented finding, and the index exists to measure the left-hand side of it.

Alesina & Perotti (1996) Β· European Economic Review 40(6):1203–1228

Tested on 71 countries over 1960–85: income inequality fuels social discontent, which raises socio-political instability, which creates uncertainty in the politico-economic environment, which in turn reduces investment. Inequality and investment are therefore inversely related.

Knack & Keefer (1997) Β· Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4):1251–1288

Social trust is associated with the rate of investment across countries. American social trust is one of the inputs to this index.

Alesina, Γ–zler, Roubini & Swagel (1996) Β· Journal of Economic Growth 1:193–215

Political instability is associated with lower subsequent growth.

Turchin (2016) Β· Ages of Discord

The structural-demographic framework this index borrows its architecture from: instability arises when popular immiseration, elite overproduction and state fiscal distress coincide. Influential and contested β€” it is used here as a structure for organising measured variables, not as a predictive law.

Known limitations

Stated plainly, because a committee will find them anyway.

Manual inputs. Five series are not produced by the automated pipeline and are refreshed by hand once a year.
Elite overproduction proxy. The measure understates the level and should be read as a trend.
No timing. Structural stress says a system is loaded, not when it releases. Turchin's own framework operates on decades. An allocation horizon of ten years may sit entirely inside a build-up phase.

Commission the full reading

Structural impact studies for governments, think tanks and large organizations: causal chains, critical thresholds, early-warning signals.

Request a study